Fog: An Experience in High Rise Living

Much like the majority of European capital cities, Amsterdam has undergone a raft of changes over the past decades, transforming itself from the halcyon days of the centre of the European hippie movement to a thoroughly global city enthralled with the gentrification that economic success brings. However there is one thing about Amsterdam that has not changed; the fog. A winters morning in the Dutch capital can often afford a hazy, ill sighted view of that which surrounds. It is so prevalent a phenomenon that Albert Camus, in his novel The Fall (1957) described it as a “cold, wet place where a thick blanket of fog constantly hangs over the crowded, neon-light-lined streets”. I lived in Amsterdam for just under a year whilst studying at the university, where for the majority of that time I resided in a room on the ninth or a ten story high rise tower block. My home was situated in and amongst the much maligned Bijlmermeer (colloquially shortened to Bijlmer) area of the city, in Amsterdam Zuidoost, the youngest district in Amsterdam with it being created in the 1960’s.

Plan Voisin
The Bijlmer

The Bijlmer (above) was initially comprised of 40,000 dwellings arranged as high rise honeycombes, in order to obtain some sunlight each day. The area was built in accordance with the principles of The Charter of Athens, the modernist architectural manifesto penned by the Congrès Internationaux d’architecture Moderne (CIAM), a congress focussed upon modernist architecture and was attended by amongst others Le Corbusier. The controversial architect devised the Plan Voisin (above) in 1924 where he intended to flatten the medieval Marais district of central Paris and in its place build a brace of identical cross shaped high rises, each isolated from each other and thus eliminating social life on the ground; a total rupture from its spatial reality. This plan, as anyone who knows anything about Paris knows, did not become reality, but from Pruitt Igoe in St Louis, Elephant and Castle London, the Parisian outskirts to Amsterdam and the Bijlmer, the logic of high rise creation did become physically manifest.

The Bijlmer was the largest undertaking of modernist design in Europe and thus represents a marked divergence in urban planning from the rest of Amsterdam. The Dutch capital is famed for the beauty of its narrow cobbled canal lined streets and the slim, elegant houses which populate the centre, yet beyond this centre and out towards the periphery the Bijlmer was created for a need unique to post war Europe. After severe bombing, the Dutch government needed to house a displaced population efficiently and in a means which was affordable. It was the teachings of the CIAM and its manifesto which ticed the right boxes. Thus the project began with the intention to house the middle classes in uniformly identical apartments – no one apartment was better than the other, as is the logic of utopian modernism – in the spirit of build it and they will come.

Yet in scenes echoed today by projects in China, ‘they’ did not come, with the targeted residents instead choosing to move to newly established suburban settlements outside of the city, to places with low rise housing such as Almere. This lack of demand left many of the apartments empty, that is until the independence of Suriname in 1975. When the former Dutch colony gained its independence, 100,000 people emigrated across the Atlantic and took up residence, many in the Bijlmer. Around the same time the buildings were starting to become long in the tooth, maintenance was needed to prevent the buildings from, essentially, breaking down. Yet, in scenes reminiscent of J.G Ballard’s ‘High-Rise’, the lifts stopped working, rubbish was flung from balconies and a heroin crisis made the upper levels of the buildings dangerous to residents.

The Bijlmer slid further and further into decline until a devastating and cataclysmic event occurred on the 4th of October 1992 when a cargo plane suffered a multiple engine failure whilst flying out of Schiphol airport and crashed into one of the high rises. Officially 36 people died, yet this is surely a conservative number as the building was home to a number of undocumented migrants, meaning that it is almost certain that more people perished in the accident. This internationally broadcasted news event thrusted the Bijlmer into the limelight, forcing the government to increase the nascent regeneration project already underway in the area. Today a number of the high rises have been levelled, with cheap low rises in their place, yet some still remain, such as the one I lived in (below).

Groenhoven: My former apartment block.

I have provided this brief historical overview of the Bijlmer to provide a context to living in a high rise building, to offer a surrounding, a background to a description of living in a space which is, by its very being, high and removed from the ground it rose from. Richard Sennett, famed urbanist and sociologist has previously written about the high rise building ala Le Corbusier, stating that ‘he got rid of life on the ground plane; instead, people live and work in isolation, higher up’. This was certainly the reality of what I experienced as a resident of a high rise development, the verdant green surroundings of the ground plane, as seen above, were infrequently used by residents, the play area below my window was often without play and the open greens used as shortcuts for a quicker route home from the adjacent metro station rather than sites for football or picnics. Yet it was in the winter months that the vertical and horizontal planes of existence were severed.

I doubt I will ever forget the first really foggy morning I experienced in Amsterdam. Bleary eyed on my way to the kettle for the medicinal first coffee of the morning before heading into town for lectures or the library, I looked out to my left through the French glass doors which opened themselves up to our living room balcony. To my surprise I could see nothing but grey, a static, as if the television windows of my abode were detuned, picking up the unwanted space between channels, the distant highway and McDonalds sign invisible, the ground smothered in this grey shroud. The fog acts as a literal severing of perception, my home could have been two stories above the ground or 100; I was spatially desensitised.

However the literal foggy mornings serve as a surrogate for a deeper understanding of what high rise living is about. For the fog enters into the building itself, not just literally in the form of condensation, but also metaphorically. As mentioned above the ground plane is banished and physically removed from that of the vertical, and therefore so are the living spaces, meaning that you only socially see other people in the close proximity of the built environment. I would speak to my neighbours – most often cursory greetings but sometimes lengthy conversations – in the confines of the lift or in the small landing outside our apartments. The horizon which bordered our interactions was stiflingly close, unlike if we encountered each other in a public space, the semi-public enclosed space of a landing reduced the social realm to a small number of people. Like talking to someone in thick fog, the surrounding world was a mystery, distorted and influenced by a perceived understanding of what the outside could be.

However the visual element of fog is only a small part of the experience. For, living in a high rise apartment, you are often aware of other people’s presence sonically. Be it the washing up of a housemate, the music of a distant party or the sound of a moped cutting through the air on its way up to your ears from the ground below; sound is a constant phenomena. I had the misfortune of living below loud neighbours, where, in muffled and distorted tones, I could hear much of their life, be it shouting arguments in the afternoon or love making in the morning, the full spectrum of a life could be listened to, like it or not. The thing is I saw these people a handful of times, yet I knew of their existence without seeing them, like a sound emanating from the fog.

The visual impact of fog upon perception is obvious, ask any driver who has headed out on to a foggy motorway, but there is also an impact upon aural experience with fog. According to ‘The Weather Guys’ low-frequency sounds travel better through fog as the water-droplets in the air interact with sound, attenuating and dispersing it. Low-frequency sounds sustain for longer, meaning the sound is coherent for longer; hence why a fog horn is low and deep in sound rather than the screeching of a police siren which is relatively high in pitch. In high rise living, it is the lower frequency sounds which travel through the walls and floors better, sounds like bass notes in music, thuds from dropped items or heavy feet, slamming doors and booming voices also pervade the floors adjacent and below the locus of sound, meaning that the same sounds which travel best in fog, travel best in an apartment complex.

This article which entwines history and autobiographical experience has endeavoured to provide a suitable metaphor to the experience of living in a high rise building. I am convinced that describing a high rise living situation as living in fog is accurate. Sensually one is limited to what they can see and with the separation of the ground plane as a space of mobility and the small spaces of the vertical acting as the social. A resident is most likely to encounter their fellow residents and neighbours in either close encounters in the lift or the landing between the lift and the door home, or through hearing them. A residents vision, like in the fog, is limited by the architectural properties of the building, the concrete prevents the eye to spot the source of sound, thus it is removed from view, which is a somewhat disorientating experience, one is aware of the presence of others but are unsure where they are. In the words of Maurice Merleau-Ponty ‘the hidden […] is present in its own way. It is in my vicinity’. The experience of living in a high rise then is living in and amongst the perpetual presence of the hidden. In the same way that fog hides that which is present, the concrete and the vertical shroud the resident from the surrounding realm, from that which they know exists and what they exist with.


The ‘American Football House’ and Understanding Urban Solitude

In 1999 a two year ‘art project’ which consisted of three young guys – one called Mike and two called Steve – released an LP which would at the time go unnoticed. Yet, 15 years later this LP would be re-released, peaking at number 68 on the Billboard 200 chart and now as dads, Steve, Steve and Mike have embarked on a series of international tour dates and finally embrace the burgeoning cult following amassed over the past decade and a half. The band, as the title suggests are American Football and the LP is titled American Football (or self titled 1) and it would become hugely influential amongst the more sensitive side of guitar rock in the 2000’s and beyond.

Steve, Steve and Mike in the late 90’s

The album itself is the product of after school jam sessions which resulted in ‘labyrinthine two-guitar interplay, set to jazzy time signatures’ whilst Mike Kinsella lays out his earnest teenage heart by ‘pulling lyrics straight from his old journal – including heart-stoppingly simple lines like “You can’t miss what you forget”. According to Rolling Stone, American Football’s debut is ‘one of the most devastating breakup albums in the history of breakup albums’. The emotion this album produces in the listener can be as complicated as the guitar tunings and time signatures utilized by the band, a mixture of melancholy hope, joy and sadness wash over the airways, transporting the juxtapositions

inherent in the band’s sound to the emotive listener – much in the same way two of American Football’s big influences have done; these being The Smiths and The Cure.

Self Titled (1)

Yet, one of the albums most distinguished features has nothing to do with the music. Much like many cult albums, the American Football LP’s cover art perfectly captures in visual terms, the sonic experience on offer, emulating seminal alternative albums such as My Bloody Valentine’s Loveless and Unknown Pleasures by Joy Division. For music journalist Joe Goggins ‘the connection in this instance is that the record sounds like it could only have been made in small-town America, and that photograph looks as if it could only really have been taken in similar surroundings’. Much like the music, the cover is stripped back and unpretentious, after all it is literally a picture of a suburban house in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois. But, the devil, as it were, is in the detail.

The photograph (by Chris Strong – a friend of the band) is taken from ground level, looking up at an illuminated window. Someone is home, but who? According to lead singer and guitarist Mike Kinsella ‘none of us ever actually lived in that house, it was friends of friends who lived there when we were all in school together, in Champaign’. In reality it was a friend of a friend, but symbolically the window could be inhabited by a potential lover ala Romeo and Juliet or a cursory glance up at the abode of the unattainable other. This is mere speculation, yet the allure of the lit window has a place in art. Edward Hopper’s Nighthawks deals with the isolation of light emanating from a closed window, as does Rene Magritte’s Good Fortune which suggests the home is an infinite space much like the starry night which composes it.

The French philosopher Gaston Bachelard discusses the phenomenological reality of the home vis-a-vis the medium of poetry in a thoroughly original and often beautiful work called The Poetics of Space (1958). At the conclusion of the first chapter, Bachelard recounts an experience lived by the hugely influential existential poet Rainer Maria Rilke, who when walking with a couple of friends one dark night caught sight of a distant hut

The lightened casement of a distant hut, the hut that stands quite alone on the horizon before one comes to fields and to marshlands […] Despite the fact that we were very close to one another, we remained three isolated individuals seeing night for the first time

704 W. High St, Champaign-Urbana

For Bachelard, the image of solitude – the single light in a distant abode – moves Rilke to a sense of isolation from his peers. Bachelard continues to state that the lit window in the distance is in essence keeping vigil on the outside world, a ‘hypnotic’ gaze which leads one ‘to dream of nothing but a solitary house in the night’, an emotional manifestation bound in the intimacy of the refuge. The lit window is a space inhabited by someone and in the case of 704 W. High St, Champaign-Urbana, it is a room in a suburban enclave south of Chicago, by all means an unexceptional space. However it is still a space from which those on the ground are separated from. Given the lyrical content and delicate, melancholic sound of the album, they who look up most are most likely craving the intimacy of the refuge within, rather than the solitude of external banishment.

According to Bachelard the house is ‘one of the greatest powers of integration for the thoughts, memories and dreams for mankind’. A distinguishing feature of the album cover is the manner in which the house is photographed; the peak of the roof cuts skywards and dominates the image, it peers over the photographer, and therefore the spectator too. Bachelard notes that the imagery of the house is comprised of two connecting themes

  1. A house is imagined as a vertical being. It rises upward. It differentiates itself in terms of its verticality. It is one of the appeals to our consciousness of verticality.
  2. A house is imagined as a consecrated being. It appeals to our consciousness of centrality

Why is the vertical nature of a house of importance to understanding this album cover? Well, Bachelard states that his ideal house would be composed of three stories: basement, ground floor, garrett/attic. The basement is ‘first and foremost the dark entity of the house’, it is a space where during both night and day darkness prevails, and beyond its walls are nothing but earth, it is a space defined by confinement. Whereas conversely, the attic stretches into the sky high above the ground from which it sprung. The lofty familarality of the attic results in it, for Bachelard, being the space for dreamers who dream under ‘a pointed roof [which] averts rain clouds. Up near the roof all our thoughts are clear’. To be staring up at the pointed roof of such a house as the American Football house is looking to the intimate dream space of another, this bedroom is ‘a vaulted room [standing] high and alone keeping watch over the past in the same way that it dominates space’ shining light down onto the photographer/observer, casting them into the role of solitude in the same manner as experienced by Rainer Maria Rilke. Gaston Bachelard encompases the feeling of such desires by noting that ‘both the house and the bedchamber bear the mark of an unforgettable intimacy’.

An overriding feature of Rilke’s experience and Bachelard’s interpretation of it, is indeed this notion of ‘solitude’ – both the solitude of the intimate refuge/dream space of the attic and the sidewalk based observer. In Letters to a Young Poet, Rilke makes his feelings clear about solitude

We are solitary. We may delude ourselves and act as though this were not so. That is all. But how much better it is to realize that we are so

This acceptance of isolation from one another that Rilke advocates ties in closely to the godfather of urban sociology Georg Simmel’s notion of the blase attitude, which was formulated the year before Rilke’s letter (1903). For Simmel, the ‘metropolitan type of man develops an organ protecting him against the threatening currents and discrepancies of his external environment’ the ‘metropolitan man’ becomes desensitised to the world around him, he becomes blase. Ultimately a blase attitude results in blase behaviour, the adoption of a mode of contact with others that is characterised by a tone of reserve and holding back that makes the formation of primary relations difficult. The counter of embodying the blase attitude, i.e. the sense of social solitude and isolation is a theme dealt with by American Football on their wonderfully wispy eight minute track Stay Home where Kinsella sings these lyrics:

But that’s life: it’s so social… So physical… So so-so… So emotional… So stay home

This is a song that lyrically wrestles with the idea that the best way to avoid the blase attitude of the contemporary metropolitan world is to embrace solitude, to avoid the physicality of the social and, well, stay home and find the intimacy of refuge in the hut and perhaps daydreams.

What this article has attempted to do is show through an album and in particular its cover art, the way in which solitude is manifested in urban life. The self titled American Football album is a unique artifact in the demonstration of solitude within the urban realm, it’s accidental cult following and subsequent influence upon numerous artists has shown that as a piece of music it maintains a connection with the experiences of others. Yet, these experiences are also bound in the cover art.

The ‘American Football’ house and the lit window viewed from the outside is a manifestation of the desire to obtain  the solitude and intimacy tied up within refuge, within a space disconnected from the blase attitude where the heart broken can be alone and recuperate whilst immersing themselves in the comforts of daydreaming. The cover depicts a suburban house in suburban America, it is unremarkable, ordinary, as are the subjects dealt with in the album, people fall in love and then out of love. However the combination of the visual and sonic is remarkable, they compliment each other perfectly, and thus can offer an insight into the experiences of urban solitude.

It is of interest that this album was recorded by a trio of teenagers, yet with the passing of time, their sophomore album (self titled 2) by three fathers fifteen years later, the cover art represents the inside of the house as its cover; I guess they eventually found intimacy in refuge.

First blog, first post!

This new blog, named after the autumn, has blossomed into life alongside the spring. The first addition to its pages is a rumination on high rise living in Amsterdam, where I use fog as a metaphor for living amongst the concrete cliff faces of a post-war European housing estate. If anyone is to read it I hope you found it informative and somewhat entertaining.

It is my intention to add articles of a similar ilk on a weekly basis and to use as diverse a range of topics as possible to bring alive the experiences of living in our increasingly urban world.

All the best!

Will

I Was Just Here! Urban Change with John Stuart Mill and Parquet Courts… In Amsterdam

Last week I returned to Amsterdam after an absence of just over a year and a half, for the first time as a tourist, not as a student – showing my girlfriend around the places, haunts, cafes and various locales of my experience of the city previously. Numerous features remained in place, the unshakeable face of the city – canals, slim and elegant houses leaning upon each other in a centuries old huddle, escaping the worst excesses of the wind. Yet, so did many of the more tactile elements of Amsterdam, the restaurants and cafes; the people. There were also new developments, most notably a whole new metro line which, for the first time, connects the Noord to the main mass of Amsterdam.

However, one feature I was glad to become acquainted with was a collection of second-hand book stalls set into a passageway at the original university campus on De Wallen. This hidden gem for any bibliophile is a five minute stroll away from the famed red light district and acts as a quiet haven, sheltered from the elements (the wind is a common accomplice to any time spent in Amsterdam) and the supreme confidence of any cyclist/driver along the cobbled, canal lined streets. It was in here that I purchased my only souvenir of my trip: a Pelican book titled A Hundred Years of Philosophy by John Passmore. This reader, printed in 1970 stretches from John Stuart Mill up until the phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty, and tackles Heidegger and Sartre, Russell and Wittgenstein along the way, a real find if you are as interested in philosophy as I am. I read the first chapter on the flight back to the  U.K, an overview of the development of John Stuart Mill’s empiricist logic. Without diverging into a lengthy analysis of Mill’s work, a certain passage stuck out, which applied directly to my experience of Amsterdam.

Passmore writes that “just because we have expectations, Mill argues, we are able to construct for ourselves a world which consists only to a slight degree of the sensations we are at the moment experiencing” (p30). In short, we fabricate much of the world which surrounds us as we expect certain stimuli or situations to arise. I write this whilst having the blind up on my bedroom window, I have not set outside yet, but looking at the overcast grey clouds and the slight swaying of the blossoming trees, I can deduce that it’s not too cold or too warm today – maybe i’ll put a jacket on over my jumper. I haven’t seen the forecast, but owing to my experiences of similar days, I can assume this to be the case. Passmore summarizes this element of Mill’s thought with a nice metaphor:

“Suppose we go out of a room; we think of its contents as existing even although we can no longer see them, because we should expect to experience certain sensations were we to re-enter the room” (p30)

This logic holds up when we think of going to visit another place for a few days. We expect our room/home/street/city to stay similar for when we get back – same can be said of a hotel room when it’s cleaned by a maid, one expects the bed to be made etc. Yet, this feeling also can arise with entire cities, especially on a return visit. As I mentioned above, numerous facets of Amsterdam remained the same, but a lot had also changed; it is a city after all. The objective changes in the fabric of the city, no matter how small made a large subjective impact upon my recollection of my original time in Amsterdam. When one is faced with unexpected change, a rupture in the expectation of sensation, there is the initial fleeting notion of grasping at visual clues to make sense of what lies before you; mutterings of ‘I swear it was here’ spring to mind.

As a student I would frequent a small, family run bakery in order to grab a sandwich for lunch – the best sandwiches I have ever had it must be said. The place would always be full, mostly occupied by individuals with book laden bags and backpacks, jostling for a view of the glass fronted display where the sandwiches sat waiting, ready for picking. For reasons beyond immediate comprehension, this display was set at the back of the bakery and, thus, led to congestion. I guess this was part of the charm. It was, as far as I have experienced, a traditional, well established Amsterdam bakery, a bit quirky and perhaps a bit old school, without the Edison light lit pretensions of numerous other bakeries, it was modest and brilliant because of it. Therefore it was a shock when I walked past its former location on my return trip to see the hallmarks of an abandoned shop – postered up windows, chipped paint, a lack of light or human presence emanating from it as it would in the past. I looked up and down the street, mentally retracing my steps and positioning from two years previously, half-looking at the other stores on the side of the road trying to make out the entity which I was rapidly becoming aware of its disappearance from this street which I thought I knew well.

To tie this back to Mill’s work, I thought of the streets contents as I left them and, perhaps naively, I expected them to remain the same for when I returned. I had fabricated a reality based upon my experiences of this street, in my mind why would they change? Yet, the street had changed, and thus so had the essence of it in my view. No longer was it the street that has the amazing bakery on it, it was now the street that had the amazing bakery on it. The reason of its closing according to a friend who I met with roughly 15 minutes after I had passed its former location, lied in the death of its long time owner and the reluctance of those left behind to continue the business. This news left me with a sense of remorse similar to that of a deceased celebrity you once held admiration for, like a musician you liked during your adolescence, I knew little to nothing of their life, yet I highly appreciated the output of their craftsmanship – be it music or be it sandwiches.

Cities never stay the same, they are entities which shift and morph into new states of existence constantly. The above example is somewhat trivial. I am a lucky tourist who was visiting and looking forward to a re-acquaintance with a gastronomical friend, it isn’t as if my life or livelihood depended on a level of predictable stability. It was a shame, but it had no lingering impact on my life.

Another example of this – there are, I’m sure thousands of examples – can be found in the song I Was Just Here by the band Parquet Courts. Sonically the song is held together by disjointed, jagged guitar tones which jolt around an awkwardly timed drum pattern. With nods to post-punk heros Wire, Gang of Four and The Fall, the lyrics entwine with the instrumentals via a spoken, almost mumbled delivery, detailing the experience of experiencing divergent sensations to what was expected in an urban environment. For instance the opening four lines highlight the potential burnout of living in a changing cityscape –

Human Performance: The album by Parquet Courts which features I Was Just Here

My keys don’t work

This knob don’t turn

My eyes feel like

Cigarette burnt.

The change is represented with the literal shutting out of the sanctuary of the home, of private space, and the continued presence and existence within the stimuli saturated realm of the city. However the clearest, and most relevant lyrics of this song, with a relation to what was discussed above come at the end:

I must have lost

My train of thought

You look so nice

Chinese-fried rice

Wouldn’t you know

That place just closed?

I was just here (x5).

What the band do here, so succinctly with strong overtones of Emile Durkheim’s concept of Anomie – is encapsulate the experience of urban change from the perspective of the everyday citizen, in micro level sensory change and how that, in turn, affects their standing in the space. By saying ‘I was just here’, they are saying, how could this change, how can I not have known this and ultimately how do I stay afloat amongst this transition, do I have a place here?

John Stuart Mill and Parquet Courts both capture the meaning of urban change and present two very different ways of understanding the central component of urban life; that it is forever changing in juxtaposition to our experience based expectations of it staying somewhat, the same. I may never be able to have another sandwich as I did in the past, or indeed thank the person behind their creation, but what replaces the now defunct bakery may add to the street in a new and original way which could enhance the lives of those who use it even more. This may be unlikely, but we can hope.